Corresponding

If still with the facilitator, the subject is not able to emit word, will push the red button again that it will take to the following definition. In this case it will be written down in the questionnaire of registry one x in the corresponding square I was not able to accede to the word. If it would give the circumstance that one is not able to accede to the word at issue, but it appears a synonymous word, this one will be pointed out also in the questionnaire, which us intruder will also give back to an indicative value of the words (alternative words persistent that blocks the appearance of the objective word) that, although is not reason of the present investigation, he can give a datum point us for others experiments. With respect to the tests pre-experiment, each subject will be able to realise four tests of practice. It is explained to them that one is one investigation on the memory, but is not explained to them that it turns on phenomenon PL. Design In the presented/displayed task a mixed factorial design is used 6x2x1x4x2x2x2, with two intersubject independent variables (variable age and sex) and five intrasubject independent variables (task, category, frequency, prioritize and target). Independent variable Intersujetos Age with 6 levels (25-30/31-35/36-40/41-45/46-50/51-55) Independent variable Intersujetos Sex with 2 levels (men/women) Independent variable Intrasujetos Task with 1 level (evocation of words) Independent variable Intrasujetos Category with 4 levels (common names, emblematic cities, famous personages, adjectives) Independent variable Intrasujetos Frequency with 2 levels (high frequency, LF) Independent variable Intrasujetos Prime with 2 levels (Visual, Semantic) Independent variable Intrasujetos Target with 2 levels (word, nonword) The dependent variable was the time that the subject took in emitting the answer, that is to say, the reaction time.